Fix names of RC2 cipher suites in sslv2.nse #314
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The previous naming for suite 0x040080 was wrong according to [1] and [2]. It is an export suite but its name did not reflect that. This also removes the extra "CBC_" in both RC2 cipher suites as it seems more consistent with other names, the specification and OpenSSL. As the names came from Wireshark, the same issue was reported to them. [3] [1] https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/OpenSSL_1_0_2-stable/ssl/ssl2.h#L95 [2] http://www-archive.mozilla.org/projects/security/pki/nss/ssl/draft02.html [3] https://code.wireshark.org/review/#/c/14197/
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The previous naming for cipher suite
0x040080was wrong according to OpenSSL and a draft specification. It is an export suite but its name did not reflect that.This also removes the extra "CBC_" in both RC2 cipher suites as it seems more consistent with other names, the specification and OpenSSL.
As the names came from Wireshark, the same issue was reported to them.